The magazine industry is controlled by the
four main firms that are Bauer, IPC Media, Hearst and Conde Nast. These firms
produce magazines such as Kerrang, Q, NME, Now, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Vogue and
Vanity Fair. All of these magazines are still widely popular but they all
produce a similar outcome. This is becoming to make individual/unique magazines
more popular because audience members like something new and different.
‘The magazine industry represents a hybrid
structure. The top tier has an oligopolistic structure, with four firms
controlling the majority of revenues in the industry. The remaining lower tier,
however, resembles a monopolistic competitive market structure. Remember that
in this type of structure, thee are many sellers offering products that are
similar but are not perfect substitutes for one another. Numerous publishing
companies vie for a share at this end of the market. The large number of
individual publishers suggests that there will be several titles geared towards
specific interests, yet each is somewhat unique in its presentation. Overall,
the prices paid for magazines indicate more of a monopolistic competitive
structure. If the entire magazine industry operated as an oligopoly prices
would be similar across the industry.’ Alan B. Albarran
This quote above backs up what I was
originally that the magazine industry is controlled by four major firms. It
also states that these firms are all creating similar products that don’t
perfectly fit their purpose. Although this quote does state that individual
quotes are beginning to come into the industry it doesn’t really cover how much
of an impact these types of magazines are creating. One of the main things I
can pick out from this quote is that these four major firms control the
majority of revenue produced in this institution. Of course this is true due to
the clear fact of how many magazines these firms produce. But in the case of
IPC Media a firm that owns magazines such as NME, Marie Claire, Look and Now
which are some of the biggest generic magazines in the UK, which clearly shows
their industry power. However in 2011 they shed 14.2% of their circulation year
on year because of the declines sales of music magazines NME an Uncut. This
shows that even though this firm has major institution power they are starting
to lose revenue through the generic magazines they produce. This again
reinforces the point that individual magazines are starting to become more
successful.
One area of individual magazines that is
becoming popular is regional magazines as people like reading something that is
directly for them. It shows something they can relate to and people like the
idea of reading what is going on where they are. As of this the publishing
group Northcliffe Media now encompass 84 newspapers/magazines across the UK
with 5.8 million readers, these magazines include ‘This is Cornwall’. The
interesting thing about Northcliffe media is that it is owned by the Daily Mail
and General Trust which is a British media conglomerate and is one of the
largest in Europe. This goes even further than Albarran’s quote as there it
only states about the four major firms that control the magazine institution.
While the magazine of ‘This is Cornwall’which seems as though it may be
produced individually away from a major firm is actually controlled by one of the
biggest conglomerate powers that we have in Britain. This shows that although
individual magazines are becoming more popular they still aren’t making it by
themselves as the major revenue is still being made by these companies. With
Daily Mail and General Trust’s accounted revenue in 2011 coming in at £1989.8
million.
Another regional magazine that has become
highly successful is 24/7 which was launched for 18-30 year olds living and
working in Devon and Cornwall. Although it has now grown to become the most
popular free magazine for music and lifestyle, with the content now including
Bristol, Bath, South Wales, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire, Somerset. You can get a
copy free from over 1500 retail outlets or download a copy from the website.
The thing about 24/7 magazine is that it is an individual magazine that
controls all it’s contents and look itself but just uses Out Of Hand Ltd for
print production. As this has no conglomerate or major firm power yet it’s still
successful it shows that magazines don’t need this power to give them the ideas
simply the funding. But the intriguing thing is that none of these firms are
involved with 24/7 even though it’s doing well so maybe this is because it’s
free. It shows a point that maybe these companies only control the revenue due
to the simple point that gaining this revenue is all they are interested in
rather than the actual creativity of the piece. But with 24/7 as an example it
shows that the audience are just as interested in pieces that aren’t
generically popular but more about the content.
No comments:
Post a Comment